Archived Wednesday Sermon Notes 2025

Sermon Notes For 12-20-23 An Introduction And Orientation Regarding The Gospel Of Matthew

For 1-22-25 Part 1. For The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 31 & 32, For This Is Our 6th Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, But You It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5.

Now, today with God’s help lets continue with this important section here in The Gospel of Matthew 5: Vs. 31 & 32 and this will be our 6th Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, Which Will Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s notice Matthew 5: 31 Furthermore it has been said whoever divorces his wife, let them give her a certificate of divorce. 32 But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

Now, today with God’s help, let’s begin to address this important matter challenging section here in The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5, verses 31&32, which also connects us back to Matthew Chapter 5 and verses 27&28 regarding the matter of adultery.

Remember Matthew 5:  27 Our Lord Jesus is speaking, You have heard that it was said to those of old, You shall not commit adultery. 28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust   for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

Now, let’s notice again Matthew 5:31. Furthermore it has been said whoever divorces his wife, let them give her a certificate of divorce. (Stop here)

First, What is a Certificate? A Certificate is an official or legal document that provides proof that something is true. Or that provides proof that someone has done something. Or that provides proof that someone has change something.

Here are some examples of different types of certificates. •Birth certificates, Death certificates, and Marriage certificates.•Educational certificates: Documents that certify that a person has completed a course or training program. •Stock certificates: Documents that verify ownership of a company's stock.•Certificates of incorporation: Documents that certify that a company has been registered. •Professional certificates: Documents that certify that a person has completed a professional training program.  •Divorce Certificate. A divorce certificate is an official document that provides basic information about a divorce such as the names of the parties involved and the date and location of the divorce and it is issued by a State's vital records office. 

What's included in a divorce certificate? Full names of both parties, including any former names. Date and location of the divorce. Official government seal to ensure authenticity 

What's a divorce certificate used for? Changing your name. Remarrying. Legal documentation and proof of divorce for settling legal or financial matters. 

Now, here are some things that we should know that the Bible teaches regarding the matter of divorce.

Now, see Leviticus 21:7. They (the Priest) shall not take a wife who is a harlot. Or a defiled woman. Nor shall they the Priest take a woman divorced from her husband. For or because the Priest is holy unto his God.

Now, see Malachi 2: 11 Judah has dealt treacherously and an abomination has been committed in Israel and in Jerusalem. For Judah has profaned The Lord's Holy institution which He loves. Judah has married the daughter of a foreign god. 14. Yet, you say for what reason? Because The Lord has been witness between you and the wife of your youth with whom you have dealt treacherously. Yet, she, the wife of your youth is your companion and your wife by Covenant. 16 For The Lord God of Israel says that He hates divorce. For it covers one's garment with violence, says the Lord of hosts. Therefore, take heed to your spirit that you do not deal treacherously.

Now, see Matthew 1: 18 Now, the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed engaged to Joseph, and before they came together to consummate their marriage. Mary was found with child of the Holy Spirit. 19 Then Joseph her engaged husband, being a just man, and he not wanting to make her a public example. Joseph was mindful to put her away secretly. 20 But while he thought about these things behold an angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream saying, Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.

(Note) The Gospel of John 8:41. Jesus is speaking you do the deeds of your father!  (Note vs. 44) Then they the Pharisees said unto Jesus, We were not born of fornication; we have one Father God!

Now, see The Gospel of John 4:6 Now Jacob's well was there, so being wearied from His journey Jesus sat thus by the well, it was about the sixth hour or noontime. 7 A woman of Samaria came to draw water and our Lord Jesus said unto her, Give Me a drink. 15 The woman said unto Jesus, Sir give me this water that I may not thirst, Nor come here to draw water again.

16 But Jesus said unto her Go and call your husband and return here. 17 The woman answered and said, I have no husband.  And Our Lord Jesus said unto her You have well said or said correctly, truthfully, I have no husband! 18 for you have had five husbands, Which implies the many times that she divorced and remarried again! Then our Lord Jesus said unto her, and the one whom you are now with is-not your husband, (Note) instead they were cohabitating! 28 The woman then left her waterpot, went her way into the city, and said to the men, 29 Come, see a Man who told me all things that I ever did. Could this be the Christ?"

Now, see 1 Corinthians 7: 7 *For I would that all men were even as I myself. But each one has his own gift from God, one in this manner and another in that. 8 But I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; 9 but if they cannot exercise self-control, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

Now, see Philippians 3: 5 circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; 6 concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

Now, see 1 Corinthians 9: 1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord?4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord,and Cephas?

Now, see 1st Corinthians 7: 10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. 11 But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife. 12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. 13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. 15 But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace.

Sermon Notes For 2-5-25 Part 3 For The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 31 & 32, For This Is Our 6th Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, But It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5. Now today, with God’s help let’s continue with this most important section revealed here in The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 31&32 Which Is Also Our (6th) Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, Which Will Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s notice Matthew 5: 31 Furthermore it has been said whoever divorces his wife, let them give her a certificate of divorce. 32 But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, Except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

Now, let’s notice again Matthew 5:32.  But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

But is Adultery according to the Bible? According To The Bible Adultery Is, Unfaithfulness Or Infidelity.  According To The Bible Is Adultery Is the breaking of a covenant. Or Being uncommitted Or easily to stray, no loyalty. And in some cases, Adultery is a form of Idolatry, The placing of someone or something as a replacement for another to whom you are supposed to be committed unto.

Now, let’s see Matthew 19: 3 The Pharisees also came unto Jesus testing Him, and saying unto Him, Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason? 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, the Pharisees Have you not read, that He (God) who made them human beings at the beginning, made them male and female, (Genesis 1: 26&27.) 5 And God said for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?  6 So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore, what God has joined together, let not man separate. 7 Then the Pharisees said unto Jesus, Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce and to put her away? (Stop here)

Now See Lets Deuteronomy 24:1 When a man takes a wife and marries her, but then it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some uncleanness in her, (Stop here)The word ‘uncleanness’ can mean, the nakedness of a thing, indecency, or improper behavior.

There were 2 major schools of thought regarding divorce around the Gospel and New Testament Periods.

One well known Rabbi named Hillel believed that divorce was permitted for any reason whatsoever including finding another woman more attractive than his own wife! Or for any frivolous matters that displeases him, She served him a bad meal. Or She walked around in public without her head being covered.

However, another well- known Rabbi named (Bet Shammai.  He Believed that Deuteronomy 24: 1-4 was intended to limit a husband's right to divorce his wife only for a matter of immorality or infidelity.

Now, let’s see again Deuteronomy 24: 1 When a man takes a wife and marries her, but then it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some uncleanness in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, and puts it into her hand and he sends her out of his house, 2 and when she has departed from his house and she goes and becomes another man's wife! 3 But then her new husband also detests her, now he writes her another certificate of divorce, puts it into her hands and sends her out of his house! Or if this second husband dies who had taken her as his wife. 4 Then she returns back to her first husband who had originally divorced her, but he must not take her back to be his wife again! Because she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before The Lord. And you shall not bring sin upon the land which The Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance.

Now, let’s notice again Matthew 19: 7 Then the Pharisees said unto Jesus. Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away? 8 And our Lord Jesus said unto the Pharisees, because of the hardness of your hearts, Moses permitted not commanded you to divorce your wives. But from the beginning it was not so, or to be this way! 9 For I say unto you whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery. 

Remember Matthew 5: 32.  But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop Here)

Now, this would be known as, Wrongful Divorce Adultery! And Wrongful Divorce adultery is when someone wrongfully divorces their spouse in most cases to pursue another relationship with a different person.

Sermon Notes For 2-12-25 Part 4 For The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 31 & 32, For This Is Our (6th) Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, (But) It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5.

Now, today with God’s help, lets finish up with this most important section revealed here in The Gospel of Matthew 5: Vs. 31&32 which is also our 6th Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, Which Will Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s notice Matthew 5:

31 Furthermore it has been said whoever divorces his wife, let them give her a certificate of divorce.

32 But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

Now, notice the phrase, “Except for Sexual Immorality or Fornication.”

(Question) are there biblical exceptions that one may have to consider when it comes to divorce?

Well, notice again, the phrase in Matthew 5: 32, “Except for Sexual Immorality Or Fornication.”

Now, let’s see Leviticus 20:

10 The man who commits adultery with another man's wife, he who commits adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress, shall surely be put to death.

11 The man who lies with his father's wife has uncovered his father's nakedness; both of them shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.

12 If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death. They have committed perversion. Their blood shall be upon them.

13 If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.

14 If a man marries a woman and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there may be no wickedness among you.

15 If a man mates with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal.

16 If a woman approaches any animal and mates with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood is upon them.

17 If a man takes his sister, his father's daughter or his mother's daughter, and sees her nakedness and she sees his nakedness, it is a wicked thing. And they shall be cut off in the sight of their people. He has uncovered his sister's nakedness. He shall bear his guilt.

18 If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has exposed her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from their people.

19 You shall not uncover the nakedness of your mother's sister nor of your father's sister, for that would uncover his near of kin. They shall bear their guilt.

20 If a man lies with his uncle's wife, he has uncovered his uncle's nakedness. They shall bear their sin; they shall die childless.

21 If a man takes his brother's wife it is an unclean thing. He has uncovered his brother's nakedness. They shall be childless.

Now, let’s go back to Matthew 5:32.  But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

(Question) are there any other biblical exceptions that one may have to consider when it comes to divorce?

Yes, see 1st Corinthians 7:

10 Now, to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: **A wife is not to depart (divorce from) her husband. (See Vs.11C)

11 However, if she or he departs they initiate the divorce or they abandon the relationship with their spouse. Let him or her remain unmarried or Let him or her be reconciled unto their spouse.  (Note) Unless that spouse has moved on and remarried.  **And a husband is not to divorce his wife.

15 But if the Unbeliever departs, divorces their spouse, then let him or her depart or initiate

the divorce. But a brother or a sister in Christ they are not under bondage or under an obligation to keep the marriage together in such a case. But God has called us to peace.

12 But unto the rest I say not the Lord, If any brother has a wife who does not believe, but she is willing to live with him, then let him not divorce her.

13 And if a woman who has a husband who does not believe, but he is willing to live with her, then let her not divorce him. (WHY)

14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, And the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband. Otherwise, your children would be unclean but now they are holy. (Stop here)

Now, let’s go back to Matthew 5:32. But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife

or spouse for any reason, except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery;

and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

(Question) are there any other biblical exceptions that one may have to consider when it comes to divorce?

Well, this next area is controversial and questionable among many believers within the body of Christ, because the Scriptures really don’t say specifically what to do in this case. And that is when it comes to the matter of “Domestic Abuse.”  •Physical Abuse. •Sexual Abuse. •Psychological Abuse.

Now, let’s go back to Matthew 5:

31 Furthermore, it has been said whoever divorces his wife, let them give her a certificate of divorce.

32 But I say unto you, that whoever divorces his wife or spouse for any reason, Except for sexual immorality causes him or her to commit adultery; and whoever marries them who is divorced commits adultery. (Stop here)

(Question) Is divorce a sin according to the bible?  Yes, in most cases.

However, remember, there are a couple of exceptions where it may be necessary to initiating a divorce and according to the Bible and that person has not sinned. But, in most cases divorce a sin according to the Bible and here is why? 

Let’s see Ecclesiastes 5:

4 When you make a vow unto God, do not delay to pay or perform it! For The Lord has no pleasure in fools, pay or perform what you have vowed!

5 Better not to vow than to vow and not pay or perform it.

6 Do not let your mouth cause your flesh to sin! Nor say before the messenger of God that it was an error or mistake. 

Why then should God be angry at your excuse and destroy the work of your hands?

 Quote James 4:17.  Therefore, to him or her who knows to do good or what is right, but they do not do it, to them it is sin!

 And finally, can the sin of an Unbiblical divorce be forgiven by God?

Only when a person or persons were involved in initiating and finalizing an unbiblical divorce,

are willing to confess or agree with God what He says about this type of sin they have committed.  And have repented had a change in their attitude, their mind or thinking even their direction about such matters. 

 See 1st John 1:

8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.

Sermon Notes For 2-19-25 Part 1   Vs 33 Thru 37                                                                                    Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5.

Now, here in The Gospel of Matthew The Gospel of Matthew 5 will be considering another important section revealed here in vs. 33 thru 37, is our 7th Unique Separate Challenging

Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, But It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

But first, let’s notice again Matthew 5:20. For I say unto you, that unless your righteousness exceeds, goes beyond the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees. Or, the Council Members of the Sanhedrin. Or, the group known as the Sadducees (Matt. 16: 1) and finally, and that of the two High Priest, Caiaphas and Annas.Unless your righteousness exceeds their self-righteousness, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.

Now, from this point our Lord Jesus exposes the hypocrisy and a spiritual credibility gap that was in existence throughout the Religious Jewish Leadership of that time.

For example, one of the first spiritual credibility gap that our Lord Jesus exposes began here in,

*21 You have heard that it was said to those of old, You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.

22 But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, 'Raca!' shall be in danger of the council.  But whoever says, You fool! shall be in danger of hell fire.

23 Therefore, if you bring your gift to the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you,

24 leave your gift there before the altar and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.

25 Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison.

26 Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny.

Now, the next Spiritual Credibility Gap that our Lord Jesus exposes is here in,

*27 You have heard that it was said to those of old, You shall not commit adultery.

28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

29 If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell.

30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell.

Still another spiritual credibility gap that our Lord Jesus exposes is here in,

*31 Furthermore, it has been said, 'Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.

32 But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.

And starting today, here is another spiritual credibility gap that our Lord Jesus exposes which begins here in,

*33 Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, you shall not swear falsely but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.

34 But I say to you, do not swear at all: neither by heaven, for it is God's throne;

35 nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.

36 Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black.

37 But let your yes be yes, and your no, no. For whatever is more than these is from the evil one. (Stop Here) 

So again, our Lord Jesus exposes the hypocrisy and a spiritual credibility gap that was in existence throughout the Religious Jewish Leadership of that day. But what do I mean when I say that there was then and there is now among God’s people, a credibility gap! 

So, what does the word “Credibility” mean?

“Credibility” is the fact that someone or something can be believed or trusted.

“Credibility” can mean, that the quality that somebody or something has that which helps people to believe or trust them. Like, truthfulness, Integrity, reliability, sincerity, authenticity.

On the other hand, a credibility gap implies that something is missing or has been left out, there is a gap!  A credibility gap implies there is a lack of trust.

There is a lack of believability. In other words, There are situations in which the things that someone says are-not believed or trusted because of the difference between what is said, and what seems to be true!

Now, see Matthew 23:

15 Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, And when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.

16 Woe unto you blind guides who say Whoever swears by the temple, It is nothing, not Binding.  However, you say whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obliged to perform it!

17 You fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold?

18 Now you also say, whoever swears by The Altar it is nothing, not Binding. 

However you say, whoever swears by The Gift that is upon The altar, he is obliged to perform it!

19 You Fools and blind leaders, For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift.

20 Therefore, he who swears by the altar, swears by it and by all things upon it.

21 And He who swears by the temple, swears by the temple and by (Him) God who dwells in it.

22 And he who swears by heaven, swears by the throne of God and by Him who Sits upon it.

Now, notice the words swears by, this was normally done by take an oath or by make a vow!

(Note) There is a distinct difference, however, between an oath and a vow!

A vow is merely a personal promise, whereas an oath is a promise made before some institutional authority. 

In taking an oath, a person not only assumes an obligation but also becomes liable to prosecution; the state and society have an interest in his act. 

Oaths serve as objective guarantees of what is promised. Swearing to tell the truth, one guarantees that what one says is true. The difference between an oath and a vow is somewhat technical. 

Vows refer to an object a person prohibits something to themselves for example wine or sex. 

The vow refers to the thing.  But an oath refers to the person, a person swears an oath to perform an action or swears that something is true. The oath pertains to the person.

Here is a very good article to consider.

Vows and oaths are solemn promises or commitments made before God or others, often invoking divine witness. In biblical terms, a vow is a voluntary promise made to God, while

an oath is a solemn declaration, often made in the presence of others, affirming the truth of a statement or the fulfillment of a promise.

Old Testament Context:

In the Old Testament, vows and oaths are significant aspects of religious and social life. They are seen as binding and sacred, requiring careful consideration before being made. 

Numbers 30:2 states, If a man makes a vow to the LORD or swears an oath to bind himself by a pledge, he must not break his word; he must do everything he has promised." 

This underscores the seriousness with which vows and oaths were regarded.

 The Nazarite vow, as described in Numbers 6, is a notable example of a vow involving a commitment to abstain from wine, avoid contact with the dead, and not cut one's hair, all as acts of dedication to God. 

Similarly, Hannah's vow in 1 Samuel 1:11, where she promises to dedicate her son to the Lord if He grants her a child, illustrates the personal and heartfelt nature of vows.

Oaths, on the other hand, were often used to affirm truthfulness or commitment in legal and personal matters. Leviticus 19:12 warns You must not swear falsely by My name and so profane the name of your God. I am the LORD.

This highlights the importance of integrity and the divine witness invoked in oaths.

New Testament Perspective: In the New Testament, Jesus addresses the issue of vows and oaths in the Sermon on the Mount. 

Matthew 5:33-37 records His teaching: Again, you have heard that it was said to the ancients, 'Do not break your oath, but fulfill your vows to the Lord.

But I tell you not to swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is His footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor should you swear by your head, for you cannot make a single hair white or black. Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' Anything more comes from the evil one."

Jesus emphasizes the importance of honesty and integrity without the need for additional oaths, suggesting that one's word should be sufficient. This teaching reflects a shift from the Old Testament practice, focusing on the heart's sincerity rather than external affirmations.

Theological Implications:  Vows and oaths in the Bible highlight the importance of truthfulness, integrity, and the seriousness of commitments made before God. They serve as reminders of the believer's accountability to God and the community. The biblical narrative encourages careful consideration before making vows or oaths, recognizing the weight of one's words and promises.

Practical Application:  For believers today, the biblical teachings on vows and oaths call for a life of integrity and honesty. While formal vows and oaths may not be as prevalent, the principles of truthfulness and commitment remain central to Christian conduct. Believers are encouraged to let their words reflect their faith and to fulfill their promises, recognizing that their ultimate accountability is to God.

So, then starting today here is another spiritual credibility gap that our Lord Jesus exposes Which Begins here in, Matthew 5: 33. Again, you have heard that it was said by those of old times, You shall not swear falsely but  shall perform your Oaths unto The Lord. (Stop here) 

At first glance there appears that there is no problem here! The Scribes and the Pharisees at that time were saying, “You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your Oaths unto The Lord! “

But remember, Matthew 23:

16 Woe unto you blind guides who say, Whoever swears by the temple, It is nothing, not Binding. However, you say whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obliged to perform it!

17 You fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold?

18 Now you also say, whoever swears by The Altar it is nothing, not Binding. However you say, whoever swears by The Gift that is upon The altar, he is obliged to perform it!

19 You Fools and blind leaders, For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift.

20 Therefore he who [swears by] the altar, swears by it and by all things upon it.

21 And He who swears by the temple, swears by the temple and by (Him) God who dwells in it.

22 And he who [swears by heaven, swears by the throne of God and by Him who Sits upon it.

Listen, using the phrase, I swear to God may be right or wrong depending on the context.

In a court of law, those called to the witness stand traditionally place a hand on a Bible and swear before God to tell the truth. 

In such an instance, the holiness and power of God are called as a witness to the proceedings. 

The invocation of God’s Word is meant to make the one testifying soberly aware of God’s presence, as God’s honor and righteousness are held up as a standard. 

However, in other cases, I swear to God” is used as a tagline or in jest, and the character of God is never even considered. This is wrong. It is similar to the flippant “Oh, my God!” that is so common today.

One of the first commandments God gave to mankind is this: “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain” (Exodus 20:7). 

There are many ways we take God’s name in vain. One way is to use God’s name as a swear word or for emphasis (“God, no, I won’t do that!”).  Such expressions are disrespectful and indicate that the speaker has little awareness of the One whose name he uses so carelessly.

Likewise, we should not invoke God’s name at the end of outrageous statements, as though tossing God’s name into the mix makes our words trustworthy.  Saying things like “It was the biggest fish in the lake! I swear to God!” is a flippant use of God’s name. 

We should avoid saying I swear to God” in such contexts, as well as similar expressions such as “God’s honest truth” or “God as my witness.”

Jesus directly taught on this subject: “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.’ But I tell you, do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No ,’ ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one” (Matthew 5:33–37). 

Basically, Jesus says that if you say something, people should be able to assume that it’s true, without the addition of various oaths

All you need to say is “yes” or “no.” Your word should be good. There’s no need to swear on this or that, and there’s certainly no reason to “swear to God” in our conversations.

There is nothing in Scripture that prohibits us from taking formal oaths, making solemn promises, or signing contracts. Using the words I swear to God in such solemnities is proper and acceptable. 

We are never discouraged from making careful, thought-out promises such as wedding vows.

Let them praise your great and awesome name he is holy (Psalm 99:3). 

God’s name is to be praised, not used as an exclamation or an afterthought. If we swear to God, 

it should only be in the context of making a formal vow, as we treat His name with all the reverence and honor He deserves (Hebrews 12:28–29).

Now, let’s see Matthew 26:

69 Now Peter sat outside in the courtyard. And a servant girl came to him, saying, You also were with Jesus of Galilee.

70 But Peter denied it before them all, saying, I do not know what you are saying.

71 And when Peter had gone out to the gate way, another girl saw him and said to those who were there, This fellow also was with Jesus of Nazareth.

72 But again Peter denied with an oath, I do not know this Man!

73 And a little later those who stood by came up and said to Peter, Surely you also are one of them for your speech betrays you.

74 Then he began to curse and swear, saying, I do not know this Man! Immediately a rooster crowed.

Actually, from The Amplified Bible Matthew 26:74 says, Then Peter began to curse (that is to invoke God’s judgment upon himself) and he swear or swore an oath saying, I do not know this man! And at that moment a rooster crowed.

Sermon Notes For 3-5-25 Part 1. For The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 38 Thru 42, For This Is Our Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, (But) It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5. Now, today with God’s help, we are going to begin this final portion at reveals Another Unique, Separate, Challenging Topic Which Can Be Life-Changing, (But) It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

So, here in The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5 and vs. 38 thru 42, we will be considering this most important section given unto us by our Lord Jesus Christ. Show you what I mean!

Now, let’s notice Mathew 5: 38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. 39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41 And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with them two. 42 Give to him or her who asks you, and from him or her who wants to borrow from you do not turn away. 43 You have heard that it was said, You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy. 44 But I say to you love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you. 45 So that you may be like the sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?47 And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so?48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect. (Stop Here)

 So again, with God’s help, we are going to begin this final portion of Chapter 5 That Reveals Another Unique, Separate, Challenging Topic Which Can Be Life-Changing, 

However, It Is Going To Reveal Either How Superficial Or How Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

And here in The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5 and vs. 38 thru 42, we will be considering this most important section given unto us by our Lord Jesus Christ. 

And yet, these words in vs. 38 thru 42 from our Lord Jesus Christ, these 11 verses are some of the most disliked, misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misapplied verses that both Christians and non-Christians alike, have been responsible for.

For these 11 verses from our Lord Jesus, will truly expose the heart, and the mindset, and the attitudes of distain, dislike and disobedience of anyone whether they are saved or unsaved when it comes to vs. 38 thru 42.

Now, today let’s start with Mathew 5: 38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. 39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek,turn the other to him also. (Stop here)

See the Gospel of Luke 6:29. To him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the other also. And from him who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your tunic either.

Now, notice again Mathew 5:38. You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. (Stop here)

This is an exact quotation found in 3 Old Testament  passages (Exodus 21:24; Leviticus 24:20;  Deuteronomy 19:15-21) and reflects the principle of lex talionis, (lex = law + talionis = retaliation = literally the "law of retaliation.")

One of the most ancient law codes discovered even in the secular code of Hammurabi (a Babylonian king - see article on Babylonian law) composed sometime around 2000BC. Simply put, this law required that the punishment match the crime and corresponds to modern expressions like "tit for tat" and "quid pro quo" (Latin for "something for something"). 

See Exodus 21: 22 If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman's husband imposes upon him;and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 But if any harm follows then you shall give life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

 Exodus 18: 13 And so it was, on the next day, that Moses sat to judge the people; and the people stood before Moses from morning until evening. 14 So when Moses' father-in-law saw all that he did for the people, he said, What is this thing that you are doing for the people? Why do you alone sit, and all the people stand before you from morning until evening?15 And Moses said to his father-in-law, "Because the people come to me to inquire of God. 16 When they have a difficulty, they come to me, and I judge between one and another; and I make known the statutes of God and His laws.

In that sense lex talionis was merciful for it limited the magnitude of one's revenge, restraining an angry response. The concept of an eye for eye,” sometimes called jus talionis or lex talionis, is part of the Mosaic Law used in the Israelites’ justice system. 

The principle is that the punishment must fit the crime and there should be a just penalty for evil actions: “If there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise” (Exodus 21:23–25).

Justice should be equitable; excessive harshness and excessive leniency should be avoided.We have no indication that the law of “an eye for an eye” was followed literally; there is never a biblical account of an Israelite being maimed as a result of this law. Also, before this particular law was given, God had already established a judicial system to hear cases and determine penalties (Exodus 18:13–26)—a system that would be unnecessary if God had intended a literal “eye for an eye” penalty. Although capital crimes were repaid with execution in ancient Israel, on the basis of multiple witnesses (Deuteronomy 17:6), most other crimes were repaid with payment in goods if you injured a man’s hand so that he could not work, you compensated that man for his lost wages.

Besides Exodus 21, the law of “an eye for an eye” is mentioned twice in the Old Testament (Leviticus 24:20Deuteronomy 19:21). Each time, the phrase is used in the context of a case being judged before a civil authority such as a judge. “An eye for an eye” was thus intended to be a guiding principle for lawgivers and judges; it was never to be used to justify vigilantism or settling grievances personally.

In the New Testament, it seems the Pharisees and scribes had taken the “eye for an eye” principle and applied it to everyday personal relationships. They taught that seeking personal revenge was acceptable. If someone punched you, you could punch him back; if someone insulted you, he was fair game for your insults. The religious leaders of Jesus’ day ignored the judicial basis of the giving of that law.

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus counters the common teaching of personal retaliation: You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you  Matthew 5:38–39). Jesus then proceeds to reveal God’s heart concerning interpersonal relationships: Do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you” (Matthew 5:39–42).

In giving this “new” command, Jesus is not nullifying the Old Testament law (Matthew 5:17). Rather, He is separating the responsibility of the government (to punish evildoers justly) from the responsibility we all have on a personal level before God to love our enemies.

We should not seek retribution for personal slights. We are to ignore personal insults (the meaning of “turn the other cheek”). Christians are to be willing to give more of their material goods, time, and labor than required, even if the demands upon us are unjust. We should loan to those who want to borrow, love our enemies, and pray for those who persecute us (verses 43-48). Enforcing “an eye for an eye” is the magistrate’s job; forgiving our enemies is ours. We see this played out today every time a victim stands up in court to publicly forgive a convicted criminal the forgiveness is personal and real, but the judge still justly demands that the sentence be carried out.

Jesus’ limiting of the “eye for an eye” principle in no way prohibits self-defense or the forceful protection of the innocent from harm. The actions of duly appointed agents of the government, such as police officers and the military, to protect citizens and preserve the peace are not in question. Jesus’ command to turn the other cheek applies to personal relationships, not judicial policy. The principle of “an eye for an eye” is meant as a judicial policy, not as a rule for interpersonal relationships. The believer in Christ is guided by Jesus’ words to forgive. The Christian is radically different from those who follow the natural inclination to respond in kind.

Now, notice again Mathew 5: 38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. 39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. (Stop here)

Now, notice again Mathew 5:39. But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your (right cheek), turn the other to him also. (Stop here)

Malcolm X said, this one time. “Anytime you tell a man to turn the other cheek or to be nonviolent in the face of a violent enemy, you're making that man defenseless. You're robbing him of his God-given right to defend himself.”

See Matthew 5: 8 Blessed are the merciful, For they shall obtain mercy. 9 Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God. 11 Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake.

The Gospel of Luke 22: 35 And Jesus said unto the disciples, When I sent you without money bag, knapsack, and sandals, did you lack anything? So, they said, “Nothing”. 36 Then He said to them, But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one. 37 For I say to you that this which is written must still be accomplished in Me: And He was numbered with the transgressors. For the things concerning Me have an end. 38 So the Disciples said Lord, look here are two swords. And Jesus said unto them, It is enough. 39 And coming out, Jesus went to the Mount of Olives, as He was accustomed and His disciples also followed Him. 47 And while He was still speaking, behold, a multitude; and he who was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them and drew near to Jesus to kiss Him. 48 But Jesus said to him, Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss? 49 When those around Him saw what was going to happen, they said unto Him Lord, shall we strike with the sword? 50 And one of them struck the servant of the high priest and cut off his right ear. 51 But Jesus answered and said, Permit even this. And He touched his ear and healed him.

Now, see also John 18: 10. Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.  11. Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me shall I not drink it?

Turn the other cheek?  This is a hard saying in the sense that it prescribes a course of action which does not come naturally to us. Unprovoked assault prompts resentment and retaliation. If one wants to be painfully literal, the assault is particularly vicious, for if the striker is right-handed, it is with the back of his hand that he hits the other on the right cheek.

This is one of a number of examples by which Jesus shows that the lifestyle of the kingdom of God is more demanding than what the law of Moses laid down. “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth’” (Mt 5:38). This was indeed laid down in Israel’s earliest law code (Ex 21:24), and when it was first said it marked a great step forward, for it imposed a strict limitation on the taking of vengeance. It replaced an earlier system of justice according to which if a member of tribe X injured a member of tribe Y, tribe Y was under an obligation to take vengeance on tribe X. This quickly led to a blood feud between the two tribes and resulted in suffering which far exceeded the original injury. But incorporated into Israel’s law code was the principle of exact retaliation: one eye, and no more, for an eye; one life, and no more, for a life. When wounded honor was satisfied with such precisely proportionate amends, life was much less fraught with hazards. The acceptance of this principle made it easier to regard monetary compensation as being, in many cases, a reasonable replacement for the infliction of an equal and opposite injury on the offending party.

But now Jesus takes a further step. “Don’t retaliate at all,” he says to his disciples. “Don’t harbor a spirit of resentment; if someone does you an injury or puts you to inconvenience, show yourself master of the situation by doing something to his advantage. If he gets some pleasure out of hitting you, let him hit you again.” (It should not be necessary to say that this saying is no more to be pressed literally than the saying about plucking out one’s right eye and throwing it away—it is not difficult to envisage the other cheek being turned in a very provocative manner.) If a soldier or other government official conscripts your services to carry a load for him so far, you are under compulsion; you are forced to do it. But, when you have reached the end of the stipulated distance, you are a free person again; then you can say to him, “If you’d like it carried farther, I will gladly carry it for you.” The initiative has now become yours, and you can take it not by voicing a sense of grievance at having been put to such inconvenience but by performing an act of grace. This way of reacting to violence and compulsion is the way of Christ.

To have one’s services conscripted to carry a soldier’s pack for him is not an everyday experience in the Western world. How, in our situation, could this particular injunction of Jesus be applied? Perhaps when a citizen is directed by a policeman to assist him in the execution of his duty. But if (say) it is a matter of helping him to arrest a larger number of suspicious characters than he can cope with single-handed, would they not also come within the scope of duty to one’s neighbor? This simply reminds us that Jesus’ injunctions are not usually of the kind that can be carried out automatically; they often require careful thought. Whatever sacrifices he expects his followers to make, he does not ask them to sacrifice their minds. What they are urged to do is to have their minds conformed to his, and when careful thought is exercised in accordance with the mind of Christ, the resulting action will be in accordance with the way of Christ.

Another parallel might be the Christian’s reaction to his income tax demand. The tax demanded must be paid; no choice can be exercised there. But suppose the Christian taxpayer, as an act of grace, pays double the amount demanded, or at least adds a substantial amount to it; what then? The computer would probably record it as tax overpaid, and the surplus would come back to him as a rebate. Perhaps it would be wisest if he were to send it to the government anonymously—not only so as not to let his left hand know what his right hand was doing, but to forestall unworthy suspicions and enquiries. Once again, the carrying out of the simple injunctions of Jesus in a complex society like ours is not so easy. But where the spirit which he recommended is present, the performance should not go too far astray.

The admonition to turn the other cheek is given by Jesus to his disciples. It belongs to the sphere of personal behavior. There are many Christians, however, who hold that this teaching should be put into practice by communities and nations as well as by individuals. Where Christian communities are concerned, we may well agree. The spectacle of the church enlisting the aid of the “secular arm” to promote its interests is rarely an edifying one. “It belongs to the church of God,” someone once said, “to receive blows rather than to inflict them—but,” he added “she is an anvil that has worn out many hammers.”7 But what about a political community?

The situation did not arise in New Testament times. The first disciples of Jesus did not occupy positions of authority. Joseph of Arimathea might be an exception: he was a member of the Sanhedrin, the supreme court of the Jewish nation, and according to Luke (Lk 23:50–51), he did not go along with his colleagues’ adverse verdict on Jesus. As the gospel spread into the Gentile world, some local churches included in their membership men who occupied positions of municipal responsibility, like Erastus, the city treasurer of Corinth (Rom 16:23); but neither Paul nor any other New Testament writer finds it necessary to give special instructions to Christian rulers corresponding to those given to Christian subjects. But what was to happen when Christians became rulers, as in due course some did? Should the Christian magistrate practice nonretaliation toward the criminal who comes up before him for judgment? Should the Christian king practice nonretaliation toward a neighboring king who declared war against him?
Paul, who repeats and underlines Jesus’ teaching of nonretaliation, regards retaliation as part of the duty of the civil ruler. “Would you have no fear of him who is in authority?” he asks. “Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain; he is the servant of God to execute his wrath on the wrongdoer” (Rom 13:3–4 RSV). For Paul, the ruler in question was the Roman emperor or someone who held executive or judicial authority under him. But his words were relevant to their chronological setting. The time had not yet come (although it did come in less than ten years after those words were written) when the empire was openly hostile to the church. Still less had the time come when the empire capitulated to the church and emperors began to profess and call themselves Christians. When they inherited the “sword” which their pagan predecessors had not borne “in vain,” how were they to use it? The answer to that question cannot be read easily off the pages of the New Testament. It is still being asked, and it is right that it should; but no single answer can claim to be the truly Christian one.

Sermon Notes For 3-12-25 Part 2 For The Gospel Of Matthew 5: Vs. 38 Thru 42, For This Is Our (8th) Unique Separate Challenging Topic That Can Be Life-Changing, (But) It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5.

Now, let’s continue here in The Gospel of Matthew 5: And vs. 38 thru 42, as we are coming to terms with this very important section that can be life-changing, but, it will also reveal how superficial or serious our commitment to obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King really is!

Show You What I Mean. 

 Now, notice Mathew 5:

38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.

40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also.

41 And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two.

42 Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.

43 You have heard that it was said, You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.

44 But I say to you love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, 

45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.

46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?

47 And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so?

48 Therefore, you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.

Now, once again, these words from our Lord Jesus Christ here in Matthew 5: 38 thru 48, these 11 verses are some of the most challenging, misunderstood, and greatly disliked verses by some Christians and non-Christians alike. But why?

Mainly, because these words from our Lord Jesus Christ here in Matthew 5: 38 thru 48, exposes the heart, the mindset, and the attitudes of everyone either saved or unsaved, 

regarding our rights to personal dignity that is seen in vs 39.

Or, our rights to justice and fairness, which is seen in vs 40.

Or, our rights when it is necessary to carry out vengeance and retaliation to anyone you are in opposition with. which is seen in vs 38&43.

Or, their rights to withhold love, or prayer or help to anyone you are in opposition with. which is seen in vs 43 &44.

For a lot of us these things that I just mentioned for our Lord Jesus to require and to expect this type of compliance to His commands and directives for life when dealing with an enemy or one who is in opposition with us, this is totally unacceptable in today’s world.

And most importantly, such commands and directives for life when dealing with an enemy or one who is in opposition with us is, counter intuitive and counter cultural for our Lord to expect such a response from us in these times that we are living in.

 My Unalienable Rights

The four core unalienable rights, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, along with the right to property. 

·         Life:
The fundamental right to exist and to be free from unwarranted deprivation of life. 

·         Liberty:
The freedom from arbitrary constraint, allowing individuals to live free from undue interference by the government or others. 

·         Pursuit of Happiness:
The right to pursue one's own goals and aspirations, to seek and obtain happiness in accordance with personal values and beliefs. 

·         Property:
The right to own and control assets, including land, material possessions, and the ability to acquire and possess them. 

My Individual Liberties set for in our country’s Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights is one of the three founding documents. It was strongly influenced by the Virginia Declaration of Rights, written by George Mason as well as English documents such as the Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, the English Bill of Rights, and the Massachusetts Body of Liberties.

 Bill of Rights Amendments

First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Second Amendment
A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Third Amendment
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Seventh Amendment
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Eighth Amendment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Ninth Amendment
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Tenth Amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

 For a lot of us these things that I just mentioned for our Lord Jesus to require and to expect this type of compliance to His commands and directives for life when dealing with an enemy or one who is in opposition with us, this is totally unacceptable in today’s world.

 And Most importantly, such commands and directives for life when dealing with   an enemy or one who is in opposition with us is, Counter intuitive and Counter Cultural for our Lord to expect such a response from us in these times that we are living in.

 (Question), do you think when we are in heaven Or living during the 1000-year kingdom reign of Jesus Christ on earth,

Do you think we will have unalienable rights and Individual Liberties something like we have on earth in this country, Like The Bill of Rights.

(First) Our Lord Jesus Christ Here In Matthew 5: 39 Exposes The Heart, The Mindset, And The Attitudes Of Everyone Either Saved Or Unsaved, Regarding Their Rights To Personal Dignity.

Now, Notice Mathew 5:39. But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.

 The Gospel of Luke 6:29A. To him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the other also. 

 Now, See Romans 12: 17 Repay no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all men. 18 If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, Vengeance is Mine, I will repay, says the Lord. 20 Therefore If your enemy is hungry, feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head.  21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

 Now, back to Matthew Chapter 5

The Gospel of Matthew 5: 40. If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also.

 The Gospel of Luke 6: 29B.  And from him who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your tunic either.

Sermon Notes for 3-19-25 Part 3 for The Gospel Of Matthew 5: And Vs. 38 Thru 48, as we are coming to terms with This Very Important Section That Can Be Life-Changing, But It Will Also Reveal How Superficial Or Serious Our Commitment To Obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King Really Is!

Now, let’s turn to The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5.

And let’s continue here in The Gospel of Matthew 5: and vs. 38 thru 48, as we are coming to terms with this very important section that can be life-changing, but, it will also reveal how superficial or serious our commitment to obey The Lord Jesus, The Messiah King really is!

Now, with God’s help for the last couple of Wednesdays in a row, we have been challenged by these at least from our perspective these unreasonable commands, these unreasonable directives from Our Lord Jesus Christ, when it comes to dealing with an enemy, whoever that might be!  Show you what I mean.

Now, notice Mathew 5:

38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

39 But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, 

turn the other to him also.

40 If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also.

(Stop here)

Now, when it comes to dealing with an enemy at least from our perspective,

these commands these directives from Our Lord Jesus Christ are considered by most

as being unreasonable and unrealistic in today’s world!

In fact, who in the world is my enemy that i must treat in this way in which our Lord Jesus has commanded us here in Matthew 5: and vs. 38 thru 48, but also in Luke 6: 27-38?   (Repeat)

First, who is my enemy?  In Jesus days for many it was the 1st Century Gentile Roman Army  occupying force in their homeland.

Mixed-Race Jewish individuals, who had a different origin, known as the Samaritans.

Other Jewish individuals who had a different belief, system, known as the Sadducees.

Other Jewish individuals who had a different political objective, known as the Zealots.

Now today, in the 21st century for many it would be, a criminal. A terrorist organization.

A rogue nation. A foreign country. A civil war within a country. A local community or neighborhood in conflict with each other due to racial or ethnic tensions, or street or biker gangs or drug cartel territorial disputes.

But with the help of the Scriptures, can I show you 2 important references that may surprise you to know who your enemy could be from a human perspective!

Now, see Micah 7: 

5 Do not trust in a friend; Do not put your confidence in a companion; and also guard the doors of your mouth from her who lies in your bosom.

6 For son dishonors father, Daughter rises against her mother, Daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; *A man's enemies are the men or the people of his own household.

7 Therefore, I will look unto the Lord; I will wait for the God of my salvation; My God will hear me.

Notice again Micah 7:6. For son dishonors father, daughter rises against her mother, daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; *a man's enemies are the men or the people of his own household.

Now, the word “Enemy” or “Enemies” can also mean,

Someone who is in opposition with you, or you with them.

Someone who is in conflict with you, or you with them.

Someone in which you have a broken relationship with, or them with you.

Someone in which you have a dysfunctional or toxic relationship with, or them with you.

A spouse, an ex-spouse, a sibling a child, a parent, a grandparent, a grandchild, an in-law,

a relative, a friend, an associate, a colleague, a brother or sister in the body of Christ, or within your church family. Or A Leader (within) the body of Christ, or within your church family.

Now, let’s see Matthew 10:

34 Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth. I did not come to bring peace

but a sword.

35 For I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law,

*36 And a man's enemies will be those of his own household.

Now again, the word “Enemy” or “Enemies” can also mean,

Someone who is in opposition with you, or you with them.

Someone who is in conflict with you, or you with them.

Someone in which you have a broken relationship with, or them with you.

Someone in which you have A dysfunctional or toxic relationship with, or them with you.

Again, a spouse, an ex- spouse, a sibling a child, a parent, a grandparent, a grandchild, an in-law, a relative, a friend, an associate, a colleague, a brother or sister in the body of Christ,

or within your church family. Or a leader within the body of Christ, or within your church family.

Therefore, how should you and i glorify The Lord and not our flesh, when dealing with an enemy?

Someone who is in opposition with you, or you with them.

Someone who is in conflict with you, or you with them.

Someone in which you have a broken relationship with, or them with you.

Someone in which you have a dysfunctional or toxic relationship with, or them with you.Well, let’s see The Gospel of Luke 6:

27 Here our Lord Jesus Christ is speaking! But I say unto you who hear Me: Love your enemies, do good unto those who hate you,

28 Bless those who curse you and Pray for those who spitefully use you.

29 To the one, your enemy, who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the other also. 

And from the one, your enemy, who takes away your cloak, do-not withhold your tunic either.  (Remember Matthew 5: 39&40)

30 Give or share with everyone who asks of you.  And from the one, your enemy, who takes away your goods, do not ask for them back.

31 And just as you want men to do unto you, you also do unto them likewise!

32 But if you love those who love you, what credit is that unto you? 

For even sinners love those who love them.

33 And if you do good unto those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? 

For even sinners do the same.

34 And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive back, what credit is that unto you? 

For even sinners lend to sinners to receive as much back.

35 But love your enemies, do good, and lend hoping for nothing in return. And your reward will be great and you will be sons of the Most-High. For He is kind unto the unthankful and evil.

36 Therefore, be merciful unto your enemy, just as your Father also is merciful.

37 •Judge not and you shall not be judged. •Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. 

•Forgive, and you will be forgiven.

38 Give or share, and it will be given unto you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, 

and running over will be put into your bosom. For with the same measure that you use it will be measured back unto you.

Now, let’s go back to Matthew Chapter 5.

Now, let’s notice Matthew Chapter 5:

41 And whoever your enemy compels you to go one mile, go with them two.  (Stop here)

At this point, i believe that our Lord Jesus is commanding us to being willing at times to inconvenience yourself when dealing with certain situations.

In our day we have a expression which says, “Going the extra mile!” 

This phrase is not to be taken literally like traveling an extra mile or go a certain distance!

Instead, it's a metaphor that signifies doing more than what is required or expected!

This is an idiom we use which means, to make an extra effort, or go beyond what is expected, often to achieve something.  In other words, being willing at times to inconvenience yourself in certain situations when dealing an enemy.

An example of this to consider, let’s see The Gospel of Luke 7:

36 Then one of the Pharisees asked Jesus to eat or dine with him.  And Jesus went to the Pharisee's house and sat down to eat. ((Note Vs.49))

37 Now, a certain woman in the city who was a sinner when she knew that Jesus, a guest at

the table in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster flask of fragrant oil,

38 and stood at Jesus feet behind Him weeping; and she began to wash His feet with her tears, 

and wiped them with the hair of her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant oil.

39 Now, when the Pharisee, the host, who had invited Jesus saw all of this, he spoke to himself, saying,

if This man were a prophet, he would know who and what manner of woman this is who is touching Him, for she is a sinner.

40 But Jesus answered and said to him, Simon I have something to say unto you.  So, Simon said, Teacher, say it!

41 "There was a certain creditor who had two debtors. One owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty.

42 And when they had nothing with which to repay, he freely forgave them both. Tell Me, therefore, which of them will love him more?"

43 Simon answered and said, "I suppose the one whom he forgave more." And He said to him, "You have rightly judged 

44 Then He turned to the woman and said to Simon, Do you see this woman? *I entered your house; you gave Me no water for My feet, but she has washed My feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head.

45 *You gave Me no kiss! but this woman has not ceased to kiss My feet since the time I came in.

46 *You did not anoint My head with oil, but this woman has anointed My feet with fragrant oil.

47 Therefore I say unto you, her sins which are many are forgiven, for she loved much! But to whom little is forgiven the same loves little.

48 Then Jesus said unto her, Your sins are forgiven.

49 And those who sat at the table with Jesus began to say to themselves, Who is this who even forgives sins?

50 Then He said to the woman, Your faith has saved you. Go in peace.

I believe that our Lord Jesus is commanding us to being willing at times to inconvenience yourself when dealing with certain situations.

Instead, it's a metaphor that signifies doing more than what is required or expected!

In other words, being willing at times to inconvenience yourself in certain situations when dealing an enemy.